Base model choices¶

Yangkang Chen
Jan 12, 2024

This notebook is to show

1. how you could use other models of the BaseEstimator class of sklearn style as base model for AdaSTEM framework, and
2. to compare the performance of different base models.

We tested the following algorithm:

• DecisionTree
• LightGBM
• XGBoost
• Stochastic gradient decent (SGD)
• Multi-layer perceptron (MLP)
• sklearn-GBM
• Ridge
• Random Forest (RF)
• Stacking of RF, XGB, and SGD

In [1]:

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import random
from tqdm.auto import tqdm
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib
import warnings
import pickle
import os
import time

from stemflow.model.AdaSTEM import AdaSTEM, AdaSTEMClassifier, AdaSTEMRegressor
from stemflow.model.Hurdle import Hurdle_for_AdaSTEM, Hurdle
from stemflow.model_selection import ST_CV

from xgboost import XGBClassifier, XGBRegressor
from sklearn.linear_model import SGDClassifier, SGDRegressor
from lightgbm import LGBMClassifier, LGBMRegressor
from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge, RidgeClassifier
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier, DecisionTreeRegressor
from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingClassifier, HistGradientBoostingRegressor
from sklearn.neural_network import MLPClassifier, MLPRegressor
from sklearn.ensemble import StackingClassifier, StackingRegressor, RandomForestClassifier, RandomForestRegressor

## The next two are not tested by could be passed as base model:
# from catboost import CatBoostClassifier, CatBoostRegressor
# from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression, LinearRegression

warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')

import pandas as pd import numpy as np import random from tqdm.auto import tqdm import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import matplotlib import warnings import pickle import os import time from stemflow.model.AdaSTEM import AdaSTEM, AdaSTEMClassifier, AdaSTEMRegressor from stemflow.model.Hurdle import Hurdle_for_AdaSTEM, Hurdle from stemflow.model_selection import ST_CV from xgboost import XGBClassifier, XGBRegressor from sklearn.linear_model import SGDClassifier, SGDRegressor from lightgbm import LGBMClassifier, LGBMRegressor from sklearn.linear_model import Ridge, RidgeClassifier from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier, DecisionTreeRegressor from sklearn.ensemble import GradientBoostingClassifier, HistGradientBoostingRegressor from sklearn.neural_network import MLPClassifier, MLPRegressor from sklearn.ensemble import StackingClassifier, StackingRegressor, RandomForestClassifier, RandomForestRegressor ## The next two are not tested by could be passed as base model: # from catboost import CatBoostClassifier, CatBoostRegressor # from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression, LinearRegression warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')

In [2]:

%load_ext autoreload
%autoreload 2

%load_ext autoreload %autoreload 2

Download data¶

Please download the sample data from:

• Mallard: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sample_data_Mallard_csv/24080745
  

Suppose now it's downloaded and saved as './Sample_data_Mallard.csv'

Alternatively, you can try other species like

• Alder Flycatcher: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sample_data_Alder_Flycatcher_csv/24080751
  
• Short-eared Owl: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sample_data_Short-eared_Owl_csv/24080742
  
• Eurasian Tree Sparrow: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sample_data_Eurasian_Tree_Sparrow_csv/24080748
  

Caveat: These bird observation data are about 200MB each file.

Load data¶

In [51]:

data = pd.read_csv(f'./Sample_data_Mallard.csv')
data = data.drop('sampling_event_identifier', axis=1)

data = pd.read_csv(f'./Sample_data_Mallard.csv') data = data.drop('sampling_event_identifier', axis=1)

In [52]:

data.head()

data.head()

Out[52]:

	longitude	latitude	count	DOY	duration_minutes	Traveling	Stationary	Area	effort_distance_km	number_observers	obsvr_species_count	time_observation_started_minute_of_day	elevation_mean	slope_mean	eastness_mean	northness_mean	bio1	bio2	bio3	bio4	bio5	bio6	bio7	bio8	bio9	bio10	bio11	bio12	bio13	bio14	bio15	bio16	bio17	bio18	bio19	closed_shrublands	cropland_or_natural_vegetation_mosaics	croplands	deciduous_broadleaf_forests	deciduous_needleleaf_forests	evergreen_broadleaf_forests	evergreen_needleleaf_forests	grasslands	mixed_forests	non_vegetated_lands	open_shrublands	permanent_wetlands	savannas	urban_and_built_up_lands	water_bodies	woody_savannas	entropy
0	-83.472224	8.859308	0.0	22	300.0	1	0	0	4.828	5.0	34.0	476	7.555556	0.758156	0.036083	-0.021484	24.883502	5.174890	59.628088	93.482247	30.529131	21.850519	8.678612	24.302626	26.536822	26.213334	23.864924	0.720487	0.127594	0.003156	0.001451	0.332425	0.026401	0.044218	0.260672	0.0	0.000000	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.138889	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000	0.0	0.0	0.777778	0.000000	0.000000	0.083333	0.000000	0.676720
1	-2.687724	43.373323	9.0	290	90.0	1	0	0	0.570	2.0	151.0	1075	30.833336	3.376527	0.050544	-0.099299	14.107917	5.224109	31.174167	376.543853	23.219421	6.461607	16.757814	9.048385	19.092725	19.236082	9.287841	0.171423	0.035598	0.004512	0.000081	0.084657	0.018400	0.030210	0.065007	0.0	0.000000	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.333333	0.000000	0.000000	0.083333	0.0	0.0	0.000000	0.194444	0.027778	0.000000	0.361111	1.359063
2	-89.884770	35.087255	0.0	141	10.0	0	1	0	-1.000	2.0	678.0	575	91.777780	0.558100	-0.187924	-0.269078	17.396487	8.673912	28.688889	718.996078	32.948335	2.713938	30.234397	14.741099	13.759220	26.795849	7.747272	0.187089	0.031802	0.005878	0.000044	0.073328	0.026618	0.039616	0.059673	0.0	0.055556	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.000000	0.000000	0.305556	0.000000	0.0	0.0	0.000000	0.527778	0.000000	0.000000	0.111111	1.104278
3	-99.216873	31.218510	0.0	104	9.0	1	0	0	0.805	2.0	976.0	657	553.166700	0.856235	-0.347514	-0.342971	20.740836	10.665164	35.409121	666.796919	35.909941	5.790119	30.119822	18.444353	30.734456	29.546417	11.701038	0.084375	0.025289	0.000791	0.000052	0.052866	0.004096	0.006064	0.015965	0.0	0.000000	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.000000	0.000000	1.000000	0.000000	0.0	0.0	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000	-0.000000
4	-124.426730	43.065847	2.0	96	30.0	1	0	0	0.161	2.0	654.0	600	6.500000	0.491816	-0.347794	-0.007017	11.822340	6.766870	35.672897	396.157833	22.608788	3.639569	18.969219	8.184412	16.290802	17.258721	7.319234	0.144122	0.044062	0.000211	0.000147	0.089238	0.004435	0.004822	0.040621	0.0	0.000000	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.361111	0.166667	0.000000	0.472222	0.0	0.0	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000	0.000000	1.020754

Get X and y¶

In [12]:

def get_X_and_y(data):
    X = data.drop('count', axis=1)
    y = np.log(data['count'].values + 1)
    return X, y

X, y = get_X_and_y(data)

def get_X_and_y(data): X = data.drop('count', axis=1) y = np.log(data['count'].values + 1) return X, y X, y = get_X_and_y(data)

Set up the set of candidate base models¶

In [145]:

base_model_dict = {
    'DecisionTree':{
        'classifier': DecisionTreeClassifier(random_state=42),
        'regressor': DecisionTreeRegressor(random_state=42)
    },
    'LightGBM':{
        'classifier': LGBMClassifier(n_jobs = 1, silent=True, random_state=42),
        'regressor': LGBMRegressor(n_jobs = 1, silent=True, random_state=42)
    },
    'XGBoost':{
        'classifier': XGBClassifier(tree_method='hist',random_state=42, verbosity = 0, n_jobs=1),
        'regressor': XGBRegressor(tree_method='hist',random_state=42, verbosity = 0, n_jobs=1)
    },
    'SGD':{
        'classifier': SGDClassifier(random_state=42),
        'regressor': SGDRegressor(random_state=42)
    },
    'MLP':{
        'classifier': MLPClassifier(random_state=42),
        'regressor': MLPRegressor(random_state=42)
    },
    'sklearn-GBM':{
        'classifier': GradientBoostingClassifier(random_state=42),
        'regressor': HistGradientBoostingRegressor(random_state=42)
    },
    'Ridge':{
        'classifier': Ridge(random_state=42),
        'regressor': RidgeClassifier(random_state=42)
    },
    'RF':{
        'classifier': RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42), 
        'regressor': RandomForestRegressor(random_state=42)
    },
    'Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD':{
        'classifier': StackingClassifier(estimators=[
                                    ('rf', RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42)),
                                    ('xgboost', XGBClassifier(random_state=42, n_jobs=1)),
                                    ('SGD', SGDClassifier(random_state=42))
                                ], final_estimator=DecisionTreeClassifier()),
        'regressor': StackingRegressor(estimators=[
                                    ('rf', RandomForestRegressor(random_state=42)),
                                    ('xgboost', XGBRegressor(random_state=42, n_jobs=1)),
                                    ('SGD', SGDRegressor(random_state=42))
                                ], final_estimator=DecisionTreeRegressor())
    }
}

base_model_dict = { 'DecisionTree':{ 'classifier': DecisionTreeClassifier(random_state=42), 'regressor': DecisionTreeRegressor(random_state=42) }, 'LightGBM':{ 'classifier': LGBMClassifier(n_jobs = 1, silent=True, random_state=42), 'regressor': LGBMRegressor(n_jobs = 1, silent=True, random_state=42) }, 'XGBoost':{ 'classifier': XGBClassifier(tree_method='hist',random_state=42, verbosity = 0, n_jobs=1), 'regressor': XGBRegressor(tree_method='hist',random_state=42, verbosity = 0, n_jobs=1) }, 'SGD':{ 'classifier': SGDClassifier(random_state=42), 'regressor': SGDRegressor(random_state=42) }, 'MLP':{ 'classifier': MLPClassifier(random_state=42), 'regressor': MLPRegressor(random_state=42) }, 'sklearn-GBM':{ 'classifier': GradientBoostingClassifier(random_state=42), 'regressor': HistGradientBoostingRegressor(random_state=42) }, 'Ridge':{ 'classifier': Ridge(random_state=42), 'regressor': RidgeClassifier(random_state=42) }, 'RF':{ 'classifier': RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42), 'regressor': RandomForestRegressor(random_state=42) }, 'Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD':{ 'classifier': StackingClassifier(estimators=[ ('rf', RandomForestClassifier(random_state=42)), ('xgboost', XGBClassifier(random_state=42, n_jobs=1)), ('SGD', SGDClassifier(random_state=42)) ], final_estimator=DecisionTreeClassifier()), 'regressor': StackingRegressor(estimators=[ ('rf', RandomForestRegressor(random_state=42)), ('xgboost', XGBRegressor(random_state=42, n_jobs=1)), ('SGD', SGDRegressor(random_state=42)) ], final_estimator=DecisionTreeRegressor()) } }

Model Training¶

Now we train AdaSTEM with each base model and 5-fold cross validation

At the same time, we record the training and testing time consumption for comparison:

In [ ]:

all_metric_list = []

for base_model_name in base_model_dict.keys():
    print(f'Training {base_model_name}')
    
    if os.path.exists(f'./Base_model_choices_metrics_{base_model_name}.csv'):
        metrics_for_base_model = pd.read_csv(f'./Base_model_choices_metrics_{base_model_name}.csv')
        all_metric_list.append(metrics_for_base_model)
        continue
    
    metrics_for_base_model = []
    
    # First thing first: Spatio-temporal train test split
    CV_generator = ST_CV(X, y,
                            Spatio_blocks_count = 50, Temporal_blocks_count=50,
                            CV=5)

    continue_training = True
    for cv_count, (X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test) in enumerate(CV_generator):
        
        if not continue_training:
            break
        
        # 1. Train AdaSTEM hurdle model
        model = AdaSTEMRegressor(
            base_model=Hurdle(
                classifier=base_model_dict[base_model_name]['classifier'],
                regressor=base_model_dict[base_model_name]['regressor']
            ),
            save_gridding_plot = True,
            ensemble_fold=10, 
            min_ensemble_required=7,
            grid_len_upper_threshold=25,
            grid_len_lower_threshold=5,
            points_lower_threshold=50,
            Spatio1='longitude',
            Spatio2 = 'latitude', 
            Temporal1 = 'DOY',
            use_temporal_to_train=True,
            n_jobs=1                       
        )
        
        start_t = time.time()
        
        ## fit adastem
        model.fit(X_train.reset_index(drop=True), y_train, verbosity=0)

        end_t = time.time()
        training_time = end_t - start_t
        
        if training_time>3600 * 2: # Stop training if timeout
            continue_training = False
            break
        
        # Evaluation
        start_t = time.time()
        pred_adastem = model.predict(X_test, verbosity=0)
        end_t = time.time()
        prediction_time = end_t - start_t
        
        perc = np.sum(np.isnan(pred_adastem.flatten()))/len(pred_adastem.flatten())
        print(f'Model {base_model_name}, CV {cv_count}: AdaSTEM percentage not predictable {round(perc*100, 2)}%')

        # 3. save metrics
        pred_df = pd.DataFrame({
            'y_true':y_test.flatten(),
            'y_pred_adastem':np.where(pred_adastem.flatten()<0, 0, pred_adastem.flatten()),
        }).dropna()
        
        ## 3.1 adastem metrics
        metric_dict = AdaSTEM.eval_STEM_res('hurdle', pred_df.y_true, pred_df.y_pred_adastem)
        metric_dict['X_train_size'] = X_train.shape[0]
        metric_dict['CV'] = cv_count
        metric_dict['perc_not_predictable'] = perc
        metric_dict['model'] = base_model_name
        metric_dict['Training_time'] = training_time
        metric_dict['Prediction_time'] = prediction_time
        metrics_for_base_model.append(metric_dict.copy())
        print(metric_dict)
        print()
        
    if not continue_training:
        continue
    
    metrics_for_base_model = pd.DataFrame(metrics_for_base_model)
    metrics_for_base_model.to_csv(f'./Base_model_choices_metrics_{base_model_name}.csv', index=False)
    
    all_metric_list.append(metrics_for_base_model)

all_metric_list = [] for base_model_name in base_model_dict.keys(): print(f'Training {base_model_name}') if os.path.exists(f'./Base_model_choices_metrics_{base_model_name}.csv'): metrics_for_base_model = pd.read_csv(f'./Base_model_choices_metrics_{base_model_name}.csv') all_metric_list.append(metrics_for_base_model) continue metrics_for_base_model = [] # First thing first: Spatio-temporal train test split CV_generator = ST_CV(X, y, Spatio_blocks_count = 50, Temporal_blocks_count=50, CV=5) continue_training = True for cv_count, (X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test) in enumerate(CV_generator): if not continue_training: break # 1. Train AdaSTEM hurdle model model = AdaSTEMRegressor( base_model=Hurdle( classifier=base_model_dict[base_model_name]['classifier'], regressor=base_model_dict[base_model_name]['regressor'] ), save_gridding_plot = True, ensemble_fold=10, min_ensemble_required=7, grid_len_upper_threshold=25, grid_len_lower_threshold=5, points_lower_threshold=50, Spatio1='longitude', Spatio2 = 'latitude', Temporal1 = 'DOY', use_temporal_to_train=True, n_jobs=1 ) start_t = time.time() ## fit adastem model.fit(X_train.reset_index(drop=True), y_train, verbosity=0) end_t = time.time() training_time = end_t - start_t if training_time>3600 * 2: # Stop training if timeout continue_training = False break # Evaluation start_t = time.time() pred_adastem = model.predict(X_test, verbosity=0) end_t = time.time() prediction_time = end_t - start_t perc = np.sum(np.isnan(pred_adastem.flatten()))/len(pred_adastem.flatten()) print(f'Model {base_model_name}, CV {cv_count}: AdaSTEM percentage not predictable {round(perc*100, 2)}%') # 3. save metrics pred_df = pd.DataFrame({ 'y_true':y_test.flatten(), 'y_pred_adastem':np.where(pred_adastem.flatten()<0, 0, pred_adastem.flatten()), }).dropna() ## 3.1 adastem metrics metric_dict = AdaSTEM.eval_STEM_res('hurdle', pred_df.y_true, pred_df.y_pred_adastem) metric_dict['X_train_size'] = X_train.shape[0] metric_dict['CV'] = cv_count metric_dict['perc_not_predictable'] = perc metric_dict['model'] = base_model_name metric_dict['Training_time'] = training_time metric_dict['Prediction_time'] = prediction_time metrics_for_base_model.append(metric_dict.copy()) print(metric_dict) print() if not continue_training: continue metrics_for_base_model = pd.DataFrame(metrics_for_base_model) metrics_for_base_model.to_csv(f'./Base_model_choices_metrics_{base_model_name}.csv', index=False) all_metric_list.append(metrics_for_base_model)

Collect and save the metrics:

In [ ]:

all_metric_df = pd.concat(all_metric_list, axis=0).reset_index(drop=False)
all_metric_df.to_csv('./Base_model_choices_metrics_all.csv',index=False)

all_metric_df = pd.concat(all_metric_list, axis=0).reset_index(drop=False) all_metric_df.to_csv('./Base_model_choices_metrics_all.csv',index=False)

It looks like this:

In [148]:

all_metric_df

all_metric_df

Out[148]:

	index	AUC	kappa	f1	precision	recall	average_precision	Spearman_r	Pearson_r	R2	MAE	MSE	poisson_deviance_explained	X_train_size	CV	perc_not_predictable	model	Training_time	Prediction_time
0	0	0.676927	0.164754	0.395370	0.248309	0.969639	0.246035	0.395031	0.205585	-1.402543e-01	5.695269e+00	1.869304e+03	2.036257e-01	318477	0	0.030740	DecisionTree	638.341520	36.681800
1	1	0.677097	0.164519	0.394620	0.247707	0.969800	0.245447	0.398250	0.084485	-4.542523e-02	5.705932e+00	6.728450e+03	2.012030e-01	317082	1	0.034444	DecisionTree	620.482282	35.525578
2	2	0.688156	0.177700	0.400270	0.252591	0.963710	0.249623	0.399074	0.225947	-2.556107e-01	5.408951e+00	1.235143e+03	2.150856e-01	323313	2	0.038598	DecisionTree	652.088356	35.994669
3	3	0.681695	0.168434	0.393946	0.247317	0.967639	0.244823	0.392326	0.131813	-2.031915e-01	5.812655e+00	2.654513e+03	2.208657e-01	319430	3	0.038066	DecisionTree	639.186853	38.188345
4	4	0.679391	0.169062	0.399731	0.251806	0.968939	0.249417	0.399125	0.103436	-5.868983e-02	5.919508e+00	4.524786e+03	1.783509e-01	321708	4	0.035866	DecisionTree	650.174912	36.997543
5	0	0.768827	0.407247	0.532626	0.414465	0.745030	0.350756	0.475785	0.101214	9.246930e-03	3.898546e+00	5.738770e+03	1.217043e-01	319636	0	0.041698	LightGBM	1130.802027	58.145997
6	1	0.756345	0.392854	0.530542	0.414509	0.736789	0.352042	0.464358	0.238286	5.250629e-02	4.034458e+00	1.463341e+03	2.244589e-01	318385	1	0.036831	LightGBM	1113.431455	63.403299
7	2	0.763330	0.395678	0.528162	0.408248	0.747817	0.348028	0.466966	0.285535	8.097991e-02	4.160880e+00	1.917779e+03	2.744931e-01	321153	2	0.039887	LightGBM	1129.783578	62.615917
8	3	0.761117	0.397418	0.533785	0.415263	0.746985	0.354740	0.467409	0.198142	3.140337e-02	4.304510e+00	1.636159e+03	1.955495e-01	319715	3	0.037828	LightGBM	1105.956876	57.119682
9	4	0.760613	0.395195	0.534253	0.414336	0.751852	0.355768	0.468287	0.161192	2.562741e-02	4.196101e+00	3.954419e+03	2.045286e-01	321163	4	0.039677	LightGBM	1101.975057	62.806188
10	0	0.767704	0.383765	0.522710	0.392517	0.782134	0.343889	0.473302	0.082486	-3.780991e-02	4.744826e+00	7.331191e+03	1.806709e-01	323292	0	0.041560	XGBoost	1708.995710	50.831794
11	1	0.769438	0.389182	0.529925	0.399202	0.787950	0.351358	0.479034	0.314612	9.669740e-02	4.064109e+00	1.585173e+03	2.815657e-01	318359	1	0.032606	XGBoost	1696.592447	53.523636
12	2	0.767355	0.386530	0.526648	0.397116	0.781587	0.347997	0.475614	0.149005	-4.513551e-02	4.223904e+00	2.136301e+03	1.168117e-01	322949	2	0.041531	XGBoost	1770.992668	52.177384
13	3	0.768899	0.390962	0.531876	0.402090	0.785378	0.353333	0.478042	0.071281	-1.444965e-01	4.313940e+00	4.024425e+03	1.421284e-01	318420	3	0.031846	XGBoost	1709.937730	50.612003
14	4	0.766167	0.382327	0.524446	0.393866	0.784550	0.346237	0.470334	0.190081	-3.150568e-01	4.229131e+00	1.408639e+03	1.731870e-01	316987	4	0.033501	XGBoost	1699.657751	57.689154
15	0	0.568514	0.093624	0.306176	0.223674	0.485107	0.196716	0.111792	0.010387	-3.071539e+24	4.064670e+13	1.509521e+28	-7.167835e+12	320669	0	0.034123	SGD	549.156352	42.873495
16	1	0.565955	0.087901	0.301290	0.217405	0.490578	0.192653	0.107385	0.019576	-1.812129e+24	4.224390e+13	1.255272e+28	-5.735458e+12	323227	1	0.037774	SGD	551.792701	41.083107
17	2	0.561289	0.082657	0.294993	0.214220	0.473550	0.189934	0.101890	0.014557	-1.632781e+25	3.875921e+13	2.055779e+28	-8.980860e+12	316061	2	0.028652	SGD	528.886567	39.269311
18	3	0.566220	0.087228	0.310652	0.222384	0.515105	0.199517	0.106638	0.020595	-1.070828e+25	4.501380e+13	1.344049e+28	-9.829474e+12	322721	3	0.036866	SGD	566.803632	42.894459
19	4	0.550666	0.069532	0.298201	0.217784	0.472771	0.197590	0.086039	0.026458	-7.921776e+24	4.193666e+13	1.313339e+28	-8.204399e+12	317460	4	0.039387	SGD	550.560598	43.890840
20	0	0.670861	0.170976	0.396345	0.254276	0.898164	0.246142	0.328702	0.146054	1.675459e-02	5.429017e+00	1.862721e+03	1.736491e-01	316581	0	0.034141	MLP	3366.648214	48.803705
21	1	0.689855	0.191453	0.404014	0.260220	0.902996	0.251403	0.348374	0.186335	2.587933e-02	5.432819e+00	1.084483e+03	1.463278e-01	325153	1	0.036100	MLP	3511.669145	45.635715
22	2	0.676100	0.181825	0.404307	0.261897	0.886180	0.252136	0.328991	0.121205	-1.022788e-03	5.286738e+00	1.487135e+03	1.101958e-01	316797	2	0.037234	MLP	3757.058820	53.844898
23	3	0.678378	0.177664	0.396828	0.254470	0.900716	0.246173	0.337930	0.169484	2.856540e-02	5.554111e+00	2.092262e+03	1.645562e-01	319132	3	0.029282	MLP	3698.640545	43.629384
24	4	0.670323	0.167892	0.390538	0.249618	0.896835	0.241510	0.323739	0.038843	-1.254342e-02	5.766947e+00	9.053999e+03	8.879981e-02	322415	4	0.037881	MLP	3715.845282	48.687055
25	0	0.742090	0.356236	0.499476	0.380980	0.724958	0.322874	0.430503	0.289288	7.847111e-02	3.970617e+00	9.686170e+02	1.991463e-01	323709	0	0.035443	sklearn-GBM	3781.791441	36.757561
26	1	0.746380	0.359339	0.504489	0.382476	0.740816	0.327864	0.441993	0.116707	1.241224e-02	4.323469e+00	6.295736e+03	2.156626e-01	319539	1	0.036875	sklearn-GBM	3736.774640	39.361697
27	2	0.744453	0.356617	0.501880	0.380617	0.736537	0.325451	0.437185	0.187681	3.167383e-02	4.328261e+00	5.296686e+03	1.800754e-01	322425	2	0.038170	sklearn-GBM	3756.966250	39.251160
28	3	0.749953	0.364206	0.503290	0.382002	0.737428	0.325296	0.441215	0.274512	7.250016e-02	4.153219e+00	1.064334e+03	2.007288e-01	324441	3	0.041028	sklearn-GBM	3734.463042	35.675822
29	4	0.736555	0.358323	0.509101	0.394116	0.718817	0.334446	0.429360	0.194414	3.244417e-02	3.966047e+00	1.509262e+03	1.637999e-01	309916	4	0.026398	sklearn-GBM	3578.116890	37.479449
30	0	0.587981	0.067230	0.329844	0.197532	0.999003	0.197503	0.212173	0.066263	-2.908829e-01	8.789755e+00	5.222286e+03	-1.884194e-03	326123	0	0.034043	Ridge	1479.461169	37.715023
31	1	0.578394	0.061180	0.334736	0.201063	0.998713	0.201029	0.189692	0.072397	-4.619032e-02	8.977184e+00	7.197808e+03	6.029367e-02	317185	1	0.035356	Ridge	1481.615117	39.675835
32	2	0.582503	0.062821	0.328215	0.196368	0.998909	0.196339	0.208397	0.170474	-4.113355e-01	7.666050e+00	1.378426e+03	4.194820e-02	321421	2	0.036384	Ridge	1500.670117	44.894184
33	3	0.578459	0.061235	0.334959	0.201195	0.999433	0.201180	0.202110	0.081479	-2.293291e-01	7.995939e+00	2.360365e+03	4.453029e-02	316725	3	0.031858	Ridge	1406.038977	38.041385
34	4	0.572533	0.055735	0.329871	0.197532	0.999488	0.197520	0.206908	0.078798	-6.139828e-01	8.201126e+00	2.671157e+03	2.874878e-02	318551	4	0.034083	Ridge	1356.848855	39.298653
35	0	0.757558	0.452687	0.553983	0.483453	0.648608	0.370327	0.487510	0.309841	9.351543e-02	3.540932e+00	1.265979e+03	2.436061e-01	322440	0	0.036333	RF	3836.595886	170.876123
36	1	0.745203	0.431237	0.548489	0.477213	0.644795	0.371415	0.466581	0.274239	2.783470e-02	3.802389e+00	7.592480e+02	1.755498e-01	317189	1	0.032399	RF	3709.731417	176.840958
37	2	0.751081	0.439306	0.553300	0.479472	0.654002	0.374534	0.475887	0.157385	2.378352e-02	4.114951e+00	6.375059e+03	1.580471e-01	317175	2	0.033251	RF	3704.024955	176.388839
38	3	0.752147	0.442738	0.553748	0.481691	0.651156	0.374105	0.479096	0.266848	6.811300e-02	3.713342e+00	1.351860e+03	1.884985e-01	323236	3	0.037140	RF	3823.032241	170.747206
39	4	0.749556	0.434372	0.546414	0.471818	0.649026	0.366254	0.469135	0.173679	2.944101e-02	4.393772e+00	5.021348e+03	1.155430e-01	319990	4	0.032083	RF	3791.946379	172.492911
40	0	0.630888	0.113870	0.366189	0.225673	0.970433	0.224189	0.283356	0.077112	5.749239e-03	6.119917e+00	7.034083e+03	1.652852e-01	322702	0	0.050001	Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	4310.372180	77.644637
41	1	0.625555	0.107551	0.363227	0.222948	0.979572	0.221986	0.273835	0.054893	-5.321084e-03	6.181746e+00	4.335952e+03	1.064697e-01	319878	1	0.047989	Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	4239.867149	75.140244
42	2	0.634542	0.113006	0.357632	0.218855	0.977417	0.217724	0.285161	0.092934	-2.171827e-02	5.202199e+00	1.655478e+03	1.565739e-01	318467	2	0.041026	Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	4270.277196	73.233479
43	3	0.629697	0.115535	0.376228	0.232844	0.979231	0.231797	0.285779	0.079920	-4.687719e-02	5.939112e+00	1.630231e+03	1.239807e-01	318075	3	0.046335	Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	4230.861040	76.579711
44	4	0.628769	0.106815	0.353717	0.215811	0.979854	0.214861	0.284204	0.071595	-1.209135e-01	5.360314e+00	1.723009e+03	1.500177e-01	321002	4	0.046267	Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	4323.455279	79.795474

Plotting metrics¶

We then create dataframe for plotting:

In [149]:

new_all_metric_df = []
for index,line in all_metric_df.iterrows():
    for me in ['AUC', 'kappa', 'f1', 'precision', 'recall',
       'average_precision', 'Spearman_r', 'Pearson_r', 'R2', 'MAE', 'MSE']:
        new_all_metric_df.append({
            'model':line['model'],
            'CV':line['CV'],
            'Training_time':line['Training_time'],
            'Prediction_time':line['Prediction_time'],
            'perc_not_predictable':line['perc_not_predictable'],
            'X_train_size':line['X_train_size'],
            'metric_name':me,
            'value':line[me]
        })
new_all_metric_df = pd.DataFrame(new_all_metric_df)

new_all_metric_df = [] for index,line in all_metric_df.iterrows(): for me in ['AUC', 'kappa', 'f1', 'precision', 'recall', 'average_precision', 'Spearman_r', 'Pearson_r', 'R2', 'MAE', 'MSE']: new_all_metric_df.append({ 'model':line['model'], 'CV':line['CV'], 'Training_time':line['Training_time'], 'Prediction_time':line['Prediction_time'], 'perc_not_predictable':line['perc_not_predictable'], 'X_train_size':line['X_train_size'], 'metric_name':me, 'value':line[me] }) new_all_metric_df = pd.DataFrame(new_all_metric_df)

In [167]:

import seaborn as sns
dat_for_plot = new_all_metric_df
dat_for_plot = pd.concat([
    dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])],
    dat_for_plot[dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])]
], axis=0)


# plot
fig, ax = plt.subplots(4, 2, figsize=(25,30), gridspec_kw={'width_ratios': [2, 2]})

### classification
plt.sca(ax[0,0])
sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[
        dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['AUC', 'kappa', 'f1', 'precision', 'recall', 'average_precision'])
    ], ci=95, 
            x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model")
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1))
plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20)
plt.title('Model performance Classification',fontsize=20)



## reg
plt.sca(ax[0,1])
sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin([])][
        dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['Spearman_r', 'Pearson_r', 'poisson_deviance_explained'])
    ], ci=95, 
            x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model")
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1))
plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20)
plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20)



## reg
plt.sca(ax[1,0])
sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])][
        dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['R2'])
    ], ci=95, 
            x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model")
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1))
plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20)
plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20)



## reg
plt.sca(ax[2,0])
sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])][
        dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['MAE'])
    ], ci=95, 
            x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model")
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1))
plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20)
plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20)


## reg
plt.sca(ax[2,1])
sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])][
        dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['MSE'])
    ], ci=95, 
            x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model")
plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20)
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1))
plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20)

## reg
plt.sca(ax[3,0])
sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot.drop_duplicates('Training_time'), ci=95, 
            x='model',y="Training_time", hue="model")
plt.title('Model performance Training Time',fontsize=20)
plt.xticks(rotation=50,fontsize=15)
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1))

## reg
plt.sca(ax[3,1])
sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot.drop_duplicates('Prediction_time'), ci=95, 
            x='model',y="Prediction_time", hue="model")
plt.xticks(rotation=50,fontsize=15)
plt.title('Model performance Prediction Time',fontsize=20)
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1))

plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()

import seaborn as sns dat_for_plot = new_all_metric_df dat_for_plot = pd.concat([ dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])], dat_for_plot[dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])] ], axis=0) # plot fig, ax = plt.subplots(4, 2, figsize=(25,30), gridspec_kw={'width_ratios': [2, 2]}) ### classification plt.sca(ax[0,0]) sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[ dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['AUC', 'kappa', 'f1', 'precision', 'recall', 'average_precision']) ], ci=95, x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model") plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1)) plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20) plt.title('Model performance Classification',fontsize=20) ## reg plt.sca(ax[0,1]) sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin([])][ dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['Spearman_r', 'Pearson_r', 'poisson_deviance_explained']) ], ci=95, x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model") plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1)) plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20) plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20) ## reg plt.sca(ax[1,0]) sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])][ dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['R2']) ], ci=95, x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model") plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1)) plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20) plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20) ## reg plt.sca(ax[2,0]) sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])][ dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['MAE']) ], ci=95, x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model") plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1)) plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20) plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20) ## reg plt.sca(ax[2,1]) sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot[~dat_for_plot.model.isin(['SGD'])][ dat_for_plot.metric_name.isin(['MSE']) ], ci=95, x="metric_name", y="value", hue="model") plt.title('Model performance Regression',fontsize=20) plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1)) plt.xticks(rotation=30,fontsize=20) ## reg plt.sca(ax[3,0]) sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot.drop_duplicates('Training_time'), ci=95, x='model',y="Training_time", hue="model") plt.title('Model performance Training Time',fontsize=20) plt.xticks(rotation=50,fontsize=15) plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1)) ## reg plt.sca(ax[3,1]) sns.barplot(data=dat_for_plot.drop_duplicates('Prediction_time'), ci=95, x='model',y="Prediction_time", hue="model") plt.xticks(rotation=50,fontsize=15) plt.title('Model performance Prediction Time',fontsize=20) plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1,1)) plt.tight_layout() plt.show()

It is not that obvious from this chart which algorithm is best in our case. However, we can still tell some facts, for example:

• XGB, LightGBM, and RF have the highest AUC score and spearman's correlation score.
• Ridge and SGD have the worst performance for both regression and classification tasks.
• Ridge and SGD are fast for training.
• RF is extremely time-consuming for prediction.

Ranking the performance for tasks and efficiency¶

Besides plotting bar chart, we can average the metrics by target categories:

• Classification
• Regression
• Training efficiency
• Testing (prediction) efficiency

Ranking for classification tasks¶

In [23]:

classification_metrics = ['AUC', 'kappa', 'f1', 'precision', 'recall', 'average_precision']
ranking_cls = all_metric_df[classification_metrics + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=False)
ranking_cls['mean_ranking_cls'] = ranking_cls[['AUC','kappa','f1','average_precision']].mean(axis=1)
ranking_cls.sort_values(by='mean_ranking_cls')

classification_metrics = ['AUC', 'kappa', 'f1', 'precision', 'recall', 'average_precision'] ranking_cls = all_metric_df[classification_metrics + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=False) ranking_cls['mean_ranking_cls'] = ranking_cls[['AUC','kappa','f1','average_precision']].mean(axis=1) ranking_cls.sort_values(by='mean_ranking_cls')

Out[23]:

	AUC	kappa	f1	precision	recall	average_precision	mean_ranking_cls
model
RF	3.0	1.0	1.0	1.0	8.0	1.0	1.50
LightGBM	2.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	6.0	2.0	2.00
XGBoost	1.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	5.0	3.0	2.50
sklearn-GBM	4.0	4.0	4.0	4.0	7.0	4.0	4.00
MLP	6.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	4.0	5.0	5.25
DecisionTree	5.0	6.0	6.0	6.0	3.0	6.0	5.75
Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	7.0	7.0	7.0	7.0	2.0	7.0	7.00
Ridge	8.0	9.0	8.0	9.0	1.0	8.0	8.25
SGD	9.0	8.0	9.0	8.0	9.0	9.0	8.75

Ranking for regression tasks¶

In [24]:

regression_metrics1 = ['Spearman_r','Pearson_r','R2','poisson_deviance_explained']
regression_metrics2 = ['MAE','MSE']
ranking_reg1 = all_metric_df[regression_metrics1 + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=False)
ranking_reg2 = all_metric_df[regression_metrics2 + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=True)
ranking_reg = pd.concat([ranking_reg1, ranking_reg2], axis=1)
ranking_reg['mean_ranking_reg'] = ranking_reg.mean(axis=1)
ranking_reg.sort_values(by='mean_ranking_reg')

regression_metrics1 = ['Spearman_r','Pearson_r','R2','poisson_deviance_explained'] regression_metrics2 = ['MAE','MSE'] ranking_reg1 = all_metric_df[regression_metrics1 + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=False) ranking_reg2 = all_metric_df[regression_metrics2 + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=True) ranking_reg = pd.concat([ranking_reg1, ranking_reg2], axis=1) ranking_reg['mean_ranking_reg'] = ranking_reg.mean(axis=1) ranking_reg.sort_values(by='mean_ranking_reg')

Out[24]:

	Spearman_r	Pearson_r	R2	poisson_deviance_explained	MAE	MSE	mean_ranking_reg
model
RF	1.0	1.0	1.0	5.0	1.0	2.0	1.833333
LightGBM	3.0	3.0	3.0	1.0	2.0	1.0	2.166667
sklearn-GBM	4.0	2.0	2.0	3.0	3.0	3.0	2.833333
XGBoost	2.0	4.0	6.0	4.0	4.0	6.0	4.333333
DecisionTree	5.0	5.0	7.0	2.0	6.0	7.0	5.333333
MLP	6.0	6.0	4.0	7.0	5.0	4.0	5.333333
Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	7.0	8.0	5.0	6.0	7.0	5.0	6.333333
Ridge	8.0	7.0	8.0	8.0	8.0	8.0	7.833333
SGD	9.0	9.0	9.0	9.0	9.0	9.0	9.000000

Ranking for time consumption¶

In [49]:

ranking_time = all_metric_df[['Training_time','Prediction_time'] + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=True)
ranking_time.sort_values(by='Prediction_time')

ranking_time = all_metric_df[['Training_time','Prediction_time'] + ['model']].groupby('model').mean().rank(ascending=True) ranking_time.sort_values(by='Prediction_time')

Out[49]:

	Training_time	Prediction_time
model
DecisionTree	2.0	1.0
sklearn-GBM	7.0	2.0
Ridge	4.0	3.0
SGD	1.0	4.0
MLP	6.0	5.0
XGBoost	5.0	6.0
LightGBM	3.0	7.0
Stacking_RF_XGB_SGD	9.0	8.0
RF	8.0	9.0

Finally, we plot these rankings using bump chart:¶

In [48]:

fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 5))
to_plot = pd.concat([ranking_cls, ranking_reg, ranking_time], axis=1).sort_values(by='mean_ranking_cls')
for index, line in to_plot.iterrows():
    ax.plot([1,2,3,4], [line['mean_ranking_cls'], line['mean_ranking_reg'], line['Training_time'], line['Prediction_time']], 'o-')

ax.set_yticks(to_plot['mean_ranking_cls'], list(to_plot.index))
yax2 = ax.secondary_yaxis("right")
yax2.set_yticks(to_plot['Prediction_time'], list(to_plot.index))
ax.set_xticks([1,2,3,4], ['Classification\nperformance', 'Regression\nperformance', 'Training\nefficiency', 'Testing\nefficiency'])
ax.set_ylabel('Ranking')
ax.invert_yaxis()
plt.show()

fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 5)) to_plot = pd.concat([ranking_cls, ranking_reg, ranking_time], axis=1).sort_values(by='mean_ranking_cls') for index, line in to_plot.iterrows(): ax.plot([1,2,3,4], [line['mean_ranking_cls'], line['mean_ranking_reg'], line['Training_time'], line['Prediction_time']], 'o-') ax.set_yticks(to_plot['mean_ranking_cls'], list(to_plot.index)) yax2 = ax.secondary_yaxis("right") yax2.set_yticks(to_plot['Prediction_time'], list(to_plot.index)) ax.set_xticks([1,2,3,4], ['Classification\nperformance', 'Regression\nperformance', 'Training\nefficiency', 'Testing\nefficiency']) ax.set_ylabel('Ranking') ax.invert_yaxis() plt.show()

Conclusion¶

An interesting trade-off: base models with good performance tend to be time-consuming.

For example, although Random Forest (RF) scores the highest for performance, it is the most time consuming (and likely memory consuming) algorithm;

Ridge and SGD, as mentioned before, are the fastest but have poor modeling performance.

Because the common conduct of using AdaSTEM is to predict on the prediction set, which is the most time-consuming step, the testing/prediction efficiency is very important.

To balance the performance and scalability, looks like XGBoost, sklearn-GBM, and LightGBM could be the best algorithm for us.

This is not to say that other algorithm are never suitable – it depends on your goal, resources availability, and time constrain. To some extreme, a dense neural network could also become the base model, if it suits your need.

In [50]:

from watermark import watermark
print(watermark())
print(watermark(packages="stemflow,numpy,scipy,pandas,xgboost,tqdm,matplotlib,h3pandas,geopandas,scikit-learn"))

from watermark import watermark print(watermark()) print(watermark(packages="stemflow,numpy,scipy,pandas,xgboost,tqdm,matplotlib,h3pandas,geopandas,scikit-learn"))

Last updated: 2024-01-12T19:41:29.000734+08:00

Python implementation: CPython
Python version       : 3.9.7
IPython version      : 8.14.0

Compiler    : Clang 11.1.0 
OS          : Darwin
Release     : 21.6.0
Machine     : arm64
Processor   : arm
CPU cores   : 8
Architecture: 64bit

stemflow    : 1.0.9.4
numpy       : 1.24.3
scipy       : 1.10.1
pandas      : 2.0.3
xgboost     : 1.7.6
tqdm        : 4.65.0
matplotlib  : 3.7.1
h3pandas    : 0.2.4
geopandas   : 0.11.1
scikit-learn: 0.0

In [ ]: